jsmn_kink (
jsmn_kink) wrote in
jsmn_kinkmeme2015-06-05 08:16 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
☆ Discussion Post
Feel free to talk about anything, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell-related or otherwise! Authors looking for a beta, and betas looking for authors, are more than welcome to advertise here.
Links:
☆ Current Prompt Post
☆ Mod Post
☆ Fills Post
☆ Misfire deletion requests
☆ Previous Rounds: Round One
Links:
☆ Current Prompt Post
☆ Mod Post
☆ Fills Post
☆ Misfire deletion requests
☆ Previous Rounds: Round One
some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)I understand it’s just an idiom and I’m far from telling any anon what they should or should not say.
But it really strikes me as a little, I don’t know, outdated? And really out of place in the kinkmeme? We came here to celebrate all kinds of sexuality and desire, didn’t we? Things amazing anon authors are writing here are incredibly hot and beautiful, there’s nothing dirty or filthy about it.
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)If I've called something "filthy" or "dirty" - and I have - then I've bloody loved it...
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)...otoh, I've called stuff "hot" and "beautiful" *as well*. I've probably used all four descriptors when commenting on multipart fic.
I don't know if you can infer terribly much from posters' use of these words, tbh.
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)If you are a writer of erotic fiction who is unhappy that your work might be praised as being "filthy" - and it *is* a term of praise in this context - then maybe you need to take it up with your readers. Otherwise, I can't help but feel you are being really rather judgmental about how a large number of posters are choosing to express their sincere enjoyment of some excellent fic.
If your point is that we should all be more open about our enjoyment of Napoleonic-era buggery fic, then fine, bully for you, go for it - but I'd rather my co-workers/my mother/the world at large didn't know about my addiction, tbh.
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Words often have more than one contradictory meaning, particularly in English. For example, the word "fast" can mean both "moving at speed", as in "the fox runs fast" or else "immoveable, not moving at all" as in "the wheels were stuck fast." It can also mean to abstain from eating.
I have to ask, are you ESL? If so, that might explain why you are confused. In the case of the words used on the meme, nobody is using them in the "normal" sense that they are used, ie pertaining to dirt. They are instead used in the same way that the word "naughty" can mean either "mischievous" or "sexy". It's just the way the English language works and doesn't reflect on anyone's opinions on the quality or morality of the prompts or fills being posted.
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-18 02:12 am (UTC)(link)I assure you I understand nobody here means “dirty” literally, but the fact that people generally use the very same word for sex and for something unclean looks rather degrading, imo.
Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-18 02:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: some language/attitude issue
(Anonymous) 2015-10-17 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)Thanks for the answer.